Wednesday, July 19, 2006

Politics USA: Left evangelical vitriol: Daily Kos features Angie Paccione on attack vs incumbent Marilyn Musgrave

.
In the campaign politics for the upcoming USA Congresssional election in November, Angie Paccione has delivered a blast of flamboyant, intellectually dishonest rhetorical inflation that seems inspired by the vehicle of her message, the extreme leftist blog Daily Kos. Paccione is running in Colorado's 4th District to take a seat in the House of Representatives, take away the seat held by incumbent Marilyn Musgrave, who happens to have sponsored legislation in the House toward amending the US Constitution to offer protection to traditional marriage as a unique institution.

Paccione calls Musgrave's effort in this regard an "attack on the Constitution" (headline) and "assault on the Constitution," and "write discrimination into the Constitution." Now, Paccione is a strident leftwinger herself, but one who describes herself as an evangelical Christian. Apparently, she's of the new breed called forth by the leftwing evangelical media, Soujourners magazine.

Since I received this communication unsolicited in my email, since most political bloggers want their message disseminated, but also because the entire piece deserves attention from evangelical and Refromed Christians who take seriously the connection between their faith and politics, I felt the need to digitally republish here. Further, because Paccione's leftwing evangelical politics offers a specific program with priorities different from what has come of President Bush's program of compassionate conservatism, itself alternative to other strands in the Republican Party, I felt comparison of the two efforts (both of them presumably towards a Gospel-rooted political practice) needed examination by refWrite readers. I certainly don't feel Paccione lives up to the standard set by Democratic Sen. Baruch Obama in a previous Special Feature on this page. -- Owlb

------------

Marilyn Musgrave's last attack on the Constitution

by Angie Paccione for Congress (Tue Jul 18, 2006)

Today, Marilyn Musgrave took to the floor of the House of Representatives in the latest installment of her assault on the U.S. Constitution. I'm Angie Paccione, candidate for Colorado's Fourth Congressional District, and I'm writing today to tell you that this will be Marilyn Musgrave's last opportunity to write discrimination into our Constitution.

Marilyn is in trouble in this district. People have had enough of this kind of representation. Colorado home foreclosures are the highest in the country, and Weld County's foreclosures are the highest in Colorado. Social Security is under threat by radical privatization. Health care costs are out of control. Student loan rates have just gone up. These aren't accidents. They are deliberate special interest policies that shift financial burdens to the American middle class in order to pay for tax cuts to the wealthiest.

Meanwhile, Marilyn's chief of staff claims that a majority of her constituents wanted her to reintroduce this amendment: "The primary reason the congresswoman introduced it is the overwhelming majority of her constituents believe in it and asked her to reintroduce it."

It seems the Musgrave campaign is admitting that the Fourth Congressional District is not her constituency anymore. When only 34% of the citizens in the Fourth District say they would vote to re-elect Marilyn Musgrave, and 51% say it's time for someone new, it's pretty clear Marilyn doesn't know how to represent a majority. She's out of touch on their values. She's out of touch on the daily struggles they are facing, and she's out of touch with the mainstream. She's showing once again that her priorities aren't with the farmers and ranchers, they aren't with the students, they aren't with the homeowners or the seniors.

These are people who are fighting for their lives. People in the Fourth District are hurting, and when they look for leadership, they see wedge issues and caving in to the special interests. They see special interests. They see cronyism and special favors. They know that with Marilyn it's only going to get worse. With her fundraising slowing to a crawl, she's going to bow down to the same divisive and extremist special interests that use anger to rally their members to fund Marilyn's negative ads.

As an evangelical Christian, I draw tremendous strength from being able to share my faith. However, I draw the line when it comes to imposing faith on other people. I live my faith, I don't legislate it. That's how the Framers intended it, and it's our duty to honor that. That's what it is to pursue happiness.

I consistently stand up for privacy rights, for the same reasons I've stood up for private property rights. I stood shoulder-to-shoulder with Michael Schiavo when he came to Colorado, because I believe the government went too far. When I say that government should stay out of our homes, out of our doctors' offices, and off our phone lines, what I'm telling them is that government should stay out of our hearts.

Make no mistake, Marilyn Musgrave is in trouble. She can't raise money in Colorado, while 90% of my contributors are in-state. Not only that, 87% of my contributors were small donors, while Marilyn Musgrave has relied on Tom DeLay's network of corruption!

We outraised her by $60,000 in the most recent quarter. Marilyn has never been outraised by an opponent before. She spent nearly every dime she raised, and flooded the district with every piece of taxpayer-funded mail she could print. It didn't work. In fact, her numbers went down!

That tells me there has been a sea-change in this district, a change that goes beyond petty party politics. People are looking for results, and now they are looking to me to provide that kind of positive change.

You can help me. Your contribution will make the difference. Whether you walk and knock for me will make the difference. Whether you talk to your neighbors and make calls will make a difference. Already, an army of volunteers is making a difference in this district. It will be because of them whether Congress will spend next year dividing families, or whether it will spend it solving problems, helping people, and making a real difference for America.


Angie Paccione

Friday, July 07, 2006

Christian philosophy: Body/mind: Dooyeweerd holds that dualism of mind and body is a basic misconstrual

.
Humanity:
Herman Dooyeweerd's Christian Philosophical Conceptualization


by Andrew Basden©The Dooyeweerd Pages, July 7, 2006.

History: Created: 4 March 2003. Last updated: 8 March 2003 Self/Heart added. 8 April 2003 God's work in heart added. 16 April 2003 links to self.html. 2 July 2003 refce to Scheper-Hughes+Lock; other minor changes. 21 November 2005 unets, link to self.html.
Used according to Basden's terms on Copyright Conditions for The Dooyeweerd Pages



Dooyeweerd's notion of humanity is wide-ranging, covering multi-aspectual living, the self, the religious root, temporality and a-temporality in creation, etc. It is useful to distinguish two main issues:

* Multi-Aspectual Living - What it means to be 'fully human'
* The Ontological Status of the Human Self

But it should be noted that this is very different from Descartes' ideas of Res extensa and Res cogitans.

Multi-Aspectual Living

If we restrict our living to a few aspects, then we do not live fully human lives. This is often what we mean by 'fully human'. For example, if we ignore the aesthetic and social aspects of life, focusing on the biotic aspect of eating and the sensitive aspect of feeling good, then we might be rightly criticised as not being 'fully human', even though our bodies and individual minds might be healthy. Likewise, an extremely selfish person is less than human; they ignore the ethical aspect of self-giving.

The Body

Dooyeweerd said [A New Critique of Theoretical Thought II:147]:

"The human body is not at all identical with an abstract 'physico-chemical soma'; it is the structural whole of temporal human existence in the intermodal coherence of all its modal aspects."

(This is treating the human body as a meaningful whole as in Dooyeweerd's Theory of Entities.) He called the body the 'function mantle'. This is very similar to what people like Scheper-Hughes and Lock are saying today about the 'Mindful Body'. But it goes further because of the spiritual element of our directedness towards the Divine; Richard Russell suggested that it is linked with the Christian idea of our bodies being 'living sacrifice' - the whole of our living offered to God, every aspect of it, and not just the 'religious' part.

The Self, the Heart
the self, ego, heart.)

We have seen, in Dooyeweerd's Entity Theory, how entities exist by virtue of functioning in the aspects. But the human being cannot be fully accounted for just in terms of multiple aspects of human living; his/her existence cannot be fully accounted for Dooyeweerd's Entity Theory. The human being is more than just a 'function mantle', a 'body'. The human being also is a Self, an Ego, a Heart.

The Heart is the 'I' that makes an integral response to all the aspects. We can understand I-ness intuitively, but we cannot understand it theoretically. The Heart or Self is likened to the hidden player of piano keys.

** New 16 April 2003 ** Click here for a page that gives all Dooyeweerd's expanded index entries on this topic.

But this is not to be confused with the mediaeval notion of homunculus or spirit, which was a model of humanity derived under the influence of the nature-grace ground motive. Nor with the mind that controls the matter of the body. Both mind and matter were seen as different types of substance in this Cosmos (especially under the influence of the matter-form ground motive. Under both these motive, it is proposed that the human spirit or soul is eternal and is the only 'part' of us that passes into heaven at death; the body is 'shed' or 'escaped from'.

In Dooyeweerd's proposal, the human Self or Heart is something beyond the aspects. It is the 'I' that responds to the the aspectual laws, being subject to them. Dooyeweerd held that not only the Heart, but also the body (as defined as function mantle rather than as 'meat') can pass into the eternal realm on death.

God's work in the human heart - which Dooyeweerd held to start with spiritual 'rebirth' in Christ - must be outworked in every modal aspect. This outworking is a process and must start from where the person was when 'reborn'. Some people start further away from God's intention than do others, and this is why one cannot judge a person by their life, their function mantle. A person's life might indicate the state of their heart, but not infallibly so, because of this difference in starting point. For example, someone who was a spoilt brat when a child will find it more of a struggle to obey the economic norm of frugality than someone who had a better quality childhood. Only God can judge the heart.

Anthropology

For both reasons there can be no single scientific area of anthropology. A scientific area is centred on a single aspect, yet human living and being is multi-aspectual. So, though there may be study of human being, there is no science thereof, but rather a plethora of sciences. The second reason is that Self is ultimately beyond even study. It is further beyond the grasp of theoretical analysis and understanding than any other thing because it transcends temporal creation.

Natural Entities

It is natural entities that are subject to the laws of aspects. There are four kingdoms of natural entities: humans, animals, plants, non-living physical things. Artificial entities are not. Dooyeweerd's Entity Theory fully explains artificial entities. It does not fully explain humans, who also have a 'heart'. Might this also be true of other types of natural entities, especially animals?

This question does not appear to have been discussed. [Research]

Supratemporal Heart

But, then, what is the human Heart, if it is not accounted for by Dooyeweerd's Entity Theory? Is it a piece of the Divine in us? Dooyeweerd maintained it is neither Divine nor is it of the aspects. Rather, he proposed that the Created Order involves not only a Temporal Reality that is governed by the aspects, but also a SupraTemporal part. The human Heart is part of the latter.

But this does not feel entirely satisfactory. It sounds too similar to the mediaeval notion of spirit and body. It may be that Dooyeweerd did not complete his working out of this area of thought.

** New 16 April 2003 ** Click here for a page that gives all Dooyeweerd's expanded index entries on this topic.

Acknowledgements

I am indebted to Richard Russell for providing material for the above account of the human Heart of Self, and especially for explaining the notion of function mantle.